So, NA, if you could vote in the presidential election.. - Page 4


 Topic: So, NA, if you could vote in the presidential election..
Users reading this topic: There are no members reading this topic.
This topic was closed by Kostas 
Poll: See topic title
261 vote(s) since May 4, 2008 06:35
MCain. (52) (20%)
Clinton (40) (15%)
Obama (169) (65%)
  Posted on May 7, 2008 01:23
A2N
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Special Jounin

Posts: 666
Joined on:
June 25, 2006
#46
Quote by Teh_blood
I totally agree. spending $5,000 dollars a second to be in a place we don't need to is genious and just what our failing economy needs.

Edit: Me like a hippy? Somehow I wouldn't mind that.
And we didn't need to be in vietnam either. =P

That's the kind of thinking that separates people in this country, you see a place you don't think you should care about, I see a place where people were oppressed and killed by a dictator that, thanks to the U.S. intervention, is now gone. The country is now our responsiblility and leaving only endangers the people we went in to help. Look at the Korean War, follow that example of staying for however long we are needed and the country will be safe; hell we'd have UN support if not for the French and their fukin veto power in the UN security council

As for Vietnam, we were outlasted, not beaten. We were winnin the damn war until dumb hippies and the Civil Rights Movement took the thunder from the support for the war and turned it against the government tryin to defeat Communism. They never gave up and we got 0 support cuz people freaked when they saw were weren't winnnin yet, it's that arrogance of Americans thinkin we're the best and they were sum poor country tryin to fight back that made the news worse
  Posted on May 7, 2008 01:26
Teh_blood
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Missing-Nin

Posts: 2190
Joined on:
June 2, 2007
#47
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
I totally agree. spending $5,000 dollars a second to be in a place we don't need to is genious and just what our failing economy needs.

Edit: Me like a hippy? Somehow I wouldn't mind that.
And we didn't need to be in vietnam either. =P

That's the kind of thinking that separates people in this country, you see a place you don't think you should care about, I see a place where people were oppressed and killed by a dictator that, thanks to the U.S. intervention, is now gone. The country is now our responsiblility and leaving only endangers the people we went in to help. Look at the Korean War, follow that example of staying for however long we are needed and the country will be safe; hell we'd have UN support if not for the French and their fukin veto power in the UN security council
But the thing is.... Dead I mention the whole we haven't really done anything in Iraq thing? =P When they held their only elections, they essentially elected the same people we had just taken care of.


What was the last thing to go through Kurt Cobain's mind?

His teeth.

"Music is my religion."-Jimi Hendrix

somewhere up there, there's a room for drugged up unbelievable guitarists, that play like they're angels.
  Posted on May 7, 2008 01:27
Sand_Death_28
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Missing-Nin

Posts: 2799
Joined on:
September 30, 2007
#48
Hiliary
she talks to much about health care but it beats
Rev. wright/Obama problem and how old mccain is so that is why i choose Hiliary

Retired player ill be on every ONCE in a while
  Posted on May 7, 2008 01:31
A2N
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Special Jounin

Posts: 666
Joined on:
June 25, 2006
#49
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
I totally agree. spending $5,000 dollars a second to be in a place we don't need to is genious and just what our failing economy needs.

Edit: Me like a hippy? Somehow I wouldn't mind that.
And we didn't need to be in vietnam either. =P

That's the kind of thinking that separates people in this country, you see a place you don't think you should care about, I see a place where people were oppressed and killed by a dictator that, thanks to the U.S. intervention, is now gone. The country is now our responsiblility and leaving only endangers the people we went in to help. Look at the Korean War, follow that example of staying for however long we are needed and the country will be safe; hell we'd have UN support if not for the French and their fukin veto power in the UN security council
But the thing is.... Dead I mention the whole we haven't really done anything in Iraq thing? =P When they held their only elections, they essentially elected the same people we had just taken care of.

Really? The people they elect have yet to oppress or kill them to stay in power, they have yet to kill thousands from poisonous gas. Why not tell me exactly how they've elected more Hussains?

What have we accomplished? Bringin democracy to a country ruled by one man and his ambitions to stay in power and who killed anyone who tried to oppose that

What would have been better? Stayin out and lettin more people die? Is that what you would rather see?
  Posted on May 7, 2008 01:33
Teh_blood
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Missing-Nin

Posts: 2190
Joined on:
June 2, 2007
#50
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
I totally agree. spending $5,000 dollars a second to be in a place we don't need to is genious and just what our failing economy needs.

Edit: Me like a hippy? Somehow I wouldn't mind that.
And we didn't need to be in vietnam either. =P

That's the kind of thinking that separates people in this country, you see a place you don't think you should care about, I see a place where people were oppressed and killed by a dictator that, thanks to the U.S. intervention, is now gone. The country is now our responsiblility and leaving only endangers the people we went in to help. Look at the Korean War, follow that example of staying for however long we are needed and the country will be safe; hell we'd have UN support if not for the French and their fukin veto power in the UN security council
But the thing is.... Dead I mention the whole we haven't really done anything in Iraq thing? =P When they held their only elections, they essentially elected the same people we had just taken care of.

Really? The people they elect have yet to oppress or kill them to stay in power, they have yet to kill thousands from poisonous gas. Why not tell me exactly how they've elected more Hussains?

What have we accomplished? Bringin democracy to a country ruled by one man and his ambitions to stay in power and who killed anyone who tried to oppose that

What would have been better? Stayin out and lettin more people die? Is that what you would rather see?
Well, you've got me there.
But if we have already done all that then we don't really need to be there, particularly not now.


What was the last thing to go through Kurt Cobain's mind?

His teeth.

"Music is my religion."-Jimi Hendrix

somewhere up there, there's a room for drugged up unbelievable guitarists, that play like they're angels.
  Posted on May 7, 2008 01:42
A2N
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Special Jounin

Posts: 666
Joined on:
June 25, 2006
#51
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
I totally agree. spending $5,000 dollars a second to be in a place we don't need to is genious and just what our failing economy needs.

Edit: Me like a hippy? Somehow I wouldn't mind that.
And we didn't need to be in vietnam either. =P

That's the kind of thinking that separates people in this country, you see a place you don't think you should care about, I see a place where people were oppressed and killed by a dictator that, thanks to the U.S. intervention, is now gone. The country is now our responsiblility and leaving only endangers the people we went in to help. Look at the Korean War, follow that example of staying for however long we are needed and the country will be safe; hell we'd have UN support if not for the French and their fukin veto power in the UN security council
But the thing is.... Dead I mention the whole we haven't really done anything in Iraq thing? =P When they held their only elections, they essentially elected the same people we had just taken care of.

Really? The people they elect have yet to oppress or kill them to stay in power, they have yet to kill thousands from poisonous gas. Why not tell me exactly how they've elected more Hussains?

What have we accomplished? Bringin democracy to a country ruled by one man and his ambitions to stay in power and who killed anyone who tried to oppose that

What would have been better? Stayin out and lettin more people die? Is that what you would rather see?
Well, you've got me there.
But if we have already done all that then we don't really need to be there, particularly not now.

I see it like this: the problem with Lebanon is, the Southern half of their country is ruled by Hezbollah, a terrorist faction against Israel completely, there was a war a couple years ago that was all over the news if you remember

That could very well happen to Iraq since it's basically bein reborn as a new country out of the ashes of Hussains old regime. al-Qaeda could find a place among the leaders in the country and they will have another base of operations, as could any other terrorist organization, namely ones against Israel, our ally

Sumthin else to remember is that Iran is a big enemy of Iraq, who knows what they may do should Iraq be left unprotected, or any other neighboring country that may have their eyes set on land or oil

In short, pulling out now leaves Iraq helpless to any number of possible enemies we wouldn't want to take over
  Posted on May 7, 2008 01:48
Teh_blood
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Missing-Nin

Posts: 2190
Joined on:
June 2, 2007
#52
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
I totally agree. spending $5,000 dollars a second to be in a place we don't need to is genious and just what our failing economy needs.

Edit: Me like a hippy? Somehow I wouldn't mind that.
And we didn't need to be in vietnam either. =P

That's the kind of thinking that separates people in this country, you see a place you don't think you should care about, I see a place where people were oppressed and killed by a dictator that, thanks to the U.S. intervention, is now gone. The country is now our responsiblility and leaving only endangers the people we went in to help. Look at the Korean War, follow that example of staying for however long we are needed and the country will be safe; hell we'd have UN support if not for the French and their fukin veto power in the UN security council
But the thing is.... Dead I mention the whole we haven't really done anything in Iraq thing? =P When they held their only elections, they essentially elected the same people we had just taken care of.

Really? The people they elect have yet to oppress or kill them to stay in power, they have yet to kill thousands from poisonous gas. Why not tell me exactly how they've elected more Hussains?

What have we accomplished? Bringin democracy to a country ruled by one man and his ambitions to stay in power and who killed anyone who tried to oppose that

What would have been better? Stayin out and lettin more people die? Is that what you would rather see?
Well, you've got me there.
But if we have already done all that then we don't really need to be there, particularly not now.

I see it like this: the problem with Lebanon is, the Southern half of their country is ruled by Hezbollah, a terrorist faction against Israel completely, there was a war a couple years ago that was all over the news if you remember

That could very well happen to Iraq since it's basically bein reborn as a new country out of the ashes of Hussains old regime. al-Qaeda could find a place among the leaders in the country and they will have another base of operations, as could any other terrorist organization, namely ones against Israel, our ally

Sumthin else to remember is that Iran is a big enemy of Iraq, who knows what they may do should Iraq be left unprotected, or any other neighboring country that may have their eyes set on land or oil

In short, pulling out now leaves Iraq helpless to any number of possible enemies we wouldn't want to take over
I still stand by the whole it's not the problem of a country that is hundreds of billions of dollars in debt to take care of it thing.
But we clearly won't change each others opinions.


What was the last thing to go through Kurt Cobain's mind?

His teeth.

"Music is my religion."-Jimi Hendrix

somewhere up there, there's a room for drugged up unbelievable guitarists, that play like they're angels.
  Posted on May 7, 2008 01:50
A2N
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Special Jounin

Posts: 666
Joined on:
June 25, 2006
#53
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by A2N
Quote by Teh_blood
I totally agree. spending $5,000 dollars a second to be in a place we don't need to is genious and just what our failing economy needs.

Edit: Me like a hippy? Somehow I wouldn't mind that.
And we didn't need to be in vietnam either. =P

That's the kind of thinking that separates people in this country, you see a place you don't think you should care about, I see a place where people were oppressed and killed by a dictator that, thanks to the U.S. intervention, is now gone. The country is now our responsiblility and leaving only endangers the people we went in to help. Look at the Korean War, follow that example of staying for however long we are needed and the country will be safe; hell we'd have UN support if not for the French and their fukin veto power in the UN security council
But the thing is.... Dead I mention the whole we haven't really done anything in Iraq thing? =P When they held their only elections, they essentially elected the same people we had just taken care of.

Really? The people they elect have yet to oppress or kill them to stay in power, they have yet to kill thousands from poisonous gas. Why not tell me exactly how they've elected more Hussains?

What have we accomplished? Bringin democracy to a country ruled by one man and his ambitions to stay in power and who killed anyone who tried to oppose that

What would have been better? Stayin out and lettin more people die? Is that what you would rather see?
Well, you've got me there.
But if we have already done all that then we don't really need to be there, particularly not now.

I see it like this: the problem with Lebanon is, the Southern half of their country is ruled by Hezbollah, a terrorist faction against Israel completely, there was a war a couple years ago that was all over the news if you remember

That could very well happen to Iraq since it's basically bein reborn as a new country out of the ashes of Hussains old regime. al-Qaeda could find a place among the leaders in the country and they will have another base of operations, as could any other terrorist organization, namely ones against Israel, our ally

Sumthin else to remember is that Iran is a big enemy of Iraq, who knows what they may do should Iraq be left unprotected, or any other neighboring country that may have their eyes set on land or oil

In short, pulling out now leaves Iraq helpless to any number of possible enemies we wouldn't want to take over
I still stand by the whole it's not the problem of a country that is hundreds of billions of dollars in debt to take care of it thing.
But we clearly won't change each others opinions.

I'll agree to disagree
  Posted on May 7, 2008 08:58
Luapman
Rank: admin

Forum Rank:
Hokage

Posts: 1359
Joined on:
July 21, 2006
#54
God I'm happy most of you can't vote...

That which does not kill us makes us stronger. - Friedrich Nietzsche
~The Dragon has left us. James Rigney 1948-2007~
Rest in peace DM of DM's. Gary Gygax 1938-2008
  Posted on May 7, 2008 10:01
Burly
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Genin

Posts: 149
Joined on:
December 31, 2007
#55
Quote by bunnylover
o-o
Depends on how Mcain stands on gay marriages, if he for it then i go for him
if he not then Obama, even though i don't like his idea of abortion o-o
Damn straight. Screw foreign policies or the fact the economy is circling the drain. What's your stance on gays and fetuses? Have fun sitting when you pee.

I took her flower.
  Posted on May 7, 2008 22:54
jnugget
Rank: moderator

Forum Rank:
ANBU

Posts: 2341
Joined on:
June 2, 2007
#56
Topic cleaned (AGAIN) by Jnugget. e.e Honestly, if we leave Iraq then that means the terrorists probably take over control of oil and etc. If they take control of oil not only does our economy would be forced down, but they are funded up until we figure something out. We're almost there, but if we leave now we'll probably get screwed in long term. After we take care of Iraq, then we can bring troops home. Then our economy get's better, and at the same time people get happier. Stocks go up, and we have a better chance and opportunity to pay off some of our 9 trillion dollars of debt. A lot of it. We are also able to regain a large part of our reputation among other countries. And then we have atleast some great momentum for the next president.
::iPanda has been tagged 1 time:: - Jnugget ©
A gift from Suika to lift my spirits. ^^ Click here.
Panda's > Steeming pile of dog crap > Monkey's > Momeepers
Mod of the OT section, Pm me if you have any concerns on the rules or rule violations with a link. :D

  Posted on May 7, 2008 22:57
Teh_blood
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Missing-Nin

Posts: 2190
Joined on:
June 2, 2007
#57
Quote by jnugget
Topic cleaned (AGAIN) by Jnugget. e.e Honestly, if we leave Iraq then that means the terrorists probably take over control of oil and etc. If they take control of oil not only does our economy would be forced down, but they are funded up until we figure something out. We're almost there, but if we leave now we'll probably get screwed in long term. After we take care of Iraq, then we can bring troops home. Then our economy get's better, and at the same time people get happier. Stocks go up, and we have a better chance and opportunity to pay off some of our 9 trillion dollars of debt. A lot of it. We are also able to regain a large part of our reputation among other countries. And then we have atleast some great momentum for the next president.
Of course, the war in Iraq is only forcing our gas prices up in the first place.

Which brings us to another thing Clinton and Mcain are both planning on doing wrong... A gas tax holiday would only make gas prices go up in the long run.


What was the last thing to go through Kurt Cobain's mind?

His teeth.

"Music is my religion."-Jimi Hendrix

somewhere up there, there's a room for drugged up unbelievable guitarists, that play like they're angels.
  Posted on May 7, 2008 23:04
jnugget
Rank: moderator

Forum Rank:
ANBU

Posts: 2341
Joined on:
June 2, 2007
#58
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by jnugget
Topic cleaned (AGAIN) by Jnugget. e.e Honestly, if we leave Iraq then that means the terrorists probably take over control of oil and etc. If they take control of oil not only does our economy would be forced down, but they are funded up until we figure something out. We're almost there, but if we leave now we'll probably get screwed in long term. After we take care of Iraq, then we can bring troops home. Then our economy get's better, and at the same time people get happier. Stocks go up, and we have a better chance and opportunity to pay off some of our 9 trillion dollars of debt. A lot of it. We are also able to regain a large part of our reputation among other countries. And then we have atleast some great momentum for the next president.
Of course, the war in Iraq is only forcing our gas prices up in the first place.

Which brings us to another thing Clinton and Mcain are both planning on doing wrong... A gas tax holiday would only make gas prices go up in the long run.


The war in Iraq as I mentioned may be hard to keep good spirits about, but it's only hurting us in the SHORT TERM. We can recover from the small amount of damage that the war in Iraq grants us. But if we leave then the damage could be too seismic for us to recover from.

I'm fully for the gas tax holiday, it won't hurt us in the long term IMO because once we take off some prices, that will give us an upward momentum. It will encourage people to look forward if anything, which is always a plus.

Oh and before you mention it, regarding McCain's 100 years comment. Regarding Iraq saying that we may be in for 100 years, I have two things to say regarding.
1. That was just speculating a possibility if things go badly. That is not very likely at all.
2. He made references that we've been in Japan and Korea for nearly as long, which means that it won't be a 100 years war if in fact we do keep people in Iraq for so long. It wouldn't still be an all out war and the vast majority of soldiers would be sent home anyway.
::iPanda has been tagged 1 time:: - Jnugget ©
A gift from Suika to lift my spirits. ^^ Click here.
Panda's > Steeming pile of dog crap > Monkey's > Momeepers
Mod of the OT section, Pm me if you have any concerns on the rules or rule violations with a link. :D

  Posted on May 7, 2008 23:09
Teh_blood
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Missing-Nin

Posts: 2190
Joined on:
June 2, 2007
#59
Quote by jnugget
Quote by Teh_blood
Quote by jnugget
Topic cleaned (AGAIN) by Jnugget. e.e Honestly, if we leave Iraq then that means the terrorists probably take over control of oil and etc. If they take control of oil not only does our economy would be forced down, but they are funded up until we figure something out. We're almost there, but if we leave now we'll probably get screwed in long term. After we take care of Iraq, then we can bring troops home. Then our economy get's better, and at the same time people get happier. Stocks go up, and we have a better chance and opportunity to pay off some of our 9 trillion dollars of debt. A lot of it. We are also able to regain a large part of our reputation among other countries. And then we have atleast some great momentum for the next president.
Of course, the war in Iraq is only forcing our gas prices up in the first place.

Which brings us to another thing Clinton and Mcain are both planning on doing wrong... A gas tax holiday would only make gas prices go up in the long run.


The war in Iraq as I mentioned may be hard to keep good spirits about, but it's only hurting us in the SHORT TERM. We can recover from the small amount of damage that the war in Iraq grants us. But if we leave then the damage could be too seismic for us to recover from.

I'm fully for the gas tax holiday, it won't hurt us in the long term IMO because once we take off some prices, that will give us an upward momentum. It will encourage people to look forward if anything, which is always a plus.
Within the first year of the war our debt had gone up in a few hundred billions of dollars.

And I've yet to see one economist aprove of the gas tax Holiday.


What was the last thing to go through Kurt Cobain's mind?

His teeth.

"Music is my religion."-Jimi Hendrix

somewhere up there, there's a room for drugged up unbelievable guitarists, that play like they're angels.
  Posted on May 8, 2008 00:14
seireitei
Rank: member

Forum Rank:
Jounin

Posts: 1494
Joined on:
January 30, 2007
#60
I personally when I turned 18 registered as a Republican because I would rather have had George Bush than John Kerry, but in this election, I'm more Democratic.

I am sure most of you would agree that the war on Iraq was a pointless crusade fueled by G W's own personal agenda. I don't think John McCain would do anything about the situation but leave us there. Spending hundreds of thousands of millions dollars that could go towards other things to help strengthen the country economically. Because this war is not like WW2 where tons of people entered the workforce causing a great surplus for the economy, this is a war over so called Democracy for those that would use that Democracy as a means to legalize social crimes.

So as far as voting is concerned, I would vote Democratically in the election, but alas, am still registered as a Republican and cannot vote for either Democratic candidates. But! If I could vote for either Hilary Clinton, or Barrack Obama, I would vote for Hilary.

Barrack Obama, to me, just looks a little suspicious in the first place <_<
I don't think he is yet qualified to run this government based off of his voting record as a representative. He has said many things in regards to what he would support, and yet many times has voted differently than what he said he would. I can at least feel better knowing that HIlary Clinton would be more likely to follow through on what she says.

Hilary Clinton has definitely also gained somewhat of an idea of what presidency is like. While many may discredit this saying that living with the president is different than being the president, it is also true to say that experience is gained just by being in situations.

Oh, and I hope nobody goes on to say anything along the lines of,
Quote by some dork
Yeah? well what about her husband and that whole Monica scandal?

If you wish to talk about that... how does something Bill Clinton may/may not have done affect his wife's eligibility to become President of the United States? Obama's pastor Reverend Wright, has been just as controversial, if not more so, since we've got a black presidential candidate with a racist black pastor. (Even though Obama has disowned Rev. Wright, why did he not do so until after it was already an issue? And in response to Rev. Wrights remarks, Obama made a pathetic Race Speach. Using race to your advantage Obama? Tsk Tsk, shame on you, I would have thought you wouldn't resort to such petty underhanded tricks.

Hilary in '08!!!

Brian you lucky sunovagun you've done it by george and forced me to return!!
Quote by Why does typing Bl3ach Tact1cs disable sigs?
It's called being petty my friend. Being Petty.